Microplastic Pollution Distribution: Differences Between Marine Reserves and Urbanised Areas

Simple item page
aut.relation.articlenumber105115
aut.relation.endpage105115
aut.relation.journalContinental Shelf Research
aut.relation.startpage105115
aut.relation.volume267
dc.contributor.authorRibó, Marta
dc.contributor.authorWatson, Sally J
dc.contributor.authorNovikova, Nina I
dc.contributor.authorDeppeler, Stacy
dc.contributor.authorSeabrook, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorHale, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorStrachan, Lorna J
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-23T03:50:31Z
dc.date.available2023-11-23T03:50:31Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-09
dc.description.abstractMicroplastic particles (<5 mm) have been observed to be widely distributed in the oceans, from estuaries the deep ocean trenches. While plastic pollution in the marine environment is a growing concern worldwide, relatively little is known about microplastic distribution and accumulation on the seafloor, particularly in marine protected area (MPAs). The delimitation of MPAs frequently follow jurisdictional or political boundaries, however the distribution of species, habitats and ecosystems does not always follow these same confines. Likewise, pollution in the marine environment do not have boundaries. This study compares microplastic content in sediment cores from two sites: an urbanised area, near the coastal township of Picton; and a site distal from the township (∼30 km) but proximal to open ocean, adjacent to the Kokomohua Marine Reserve, in the region of Queen Charlotte Sound/Tōtaranui (QCS), Aotearoa/New Zealand. Microplastic particles were identified throughout the sediment cores from both locations, reaching depths of ∼45 cm below the seabed. Our findings revealed that marine sediments adjacent to the marine reserve had four times the microplastic accumulation of marine sediments from near the coastal township. The abundance of microplastics across the sediment depth profiles also varied between the two sites, suggesting different accumulation of microplastics on the seafloor due to differences in the frequency and extent of seabed disturbance experienced by the two locations. Our study demonstrates the extent to which human stressors such as microplastic pollution proliferate and concentrate in the environment, particularly in areas considered to be near-pristine with strict environmental protections.
dc.identifier.citationContinental Shelf Research, ISSN: 0278-4343 (Print); 1873-6955 (Online), Elsevier BV, 267, 105115-105115. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2023.105115
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.csr.2023.105115
dc.identifier.issn0278-4343
dc.identifier.issn1873-6955
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/16989
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278434323001929
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject37 Earth Sciences
dc.subject31 Biological Sciences
dc.subject14 Life Below Water
dc.subject15 Life on Land
dc.subject04 Earth Sciences
dc.subject06 Biological Sciences
dc.subjectOceanography
dc.subject31 Biological sciences
dc.subject37 Earth sciences
dc.titleMicroplastic Pollution Distribution: Differences Between Marine Reserves and Urbanised Areas
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id523398
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ribo et al._2023_Microplastic pollution distribution.pdf
Size:
8.49 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article
Download
Collections
School of Science - Te Kura Pūtaiao